Skip to main content

Tento článek zatím není dostupný v češtině. Zobrazuje se anglická verze.

13 min čtení

Strategic Cloud & Cost Governance for the AI Era: FinOps for LLMs, GPU Capacity Planning, and Sustainable IT

Practical unit economics, GPU right-sizing, and policy automation to scale AI responsibly in legal enterprises

Abstract AI technology visualization

AI features change cloud spend patterns: compute-heavy bursts, high memory footprints, and data egress from vector stores. Legal workloads add constraints around segregation, data residency, and audit. The strategy is to build unit economics, right-size accelerators, optimize models, and automate controls that enforce both budget and compliance.

Unit economics for legal AI features

Define cost per unit value

- Draft generation: cost per approved draft; include embedding lookups, generation tokens, guardrails, and review time. - Document review: cost per thousand pages reviewed with AI assistance; measure attorney time saved. - Search and summarize: cost per query with retrieval, rerank, and caching hit/miss rates.

Key cost drivers

- Model selection and token throughput; context window size and reranker overhead. - Vector store read/write ops; metadata filters; replication across regions. - Guardrail and evaluation pipelines; logging to WORM stores.

Pricing models

- Provider APIs vs. self-hosted models on GPUs. - Consider reserve/committed use discounts for predictable baselines; on-demand or spot for bursty inference.

Showback and chargeback models

Showback

- Allocate costs by matter, practice group, or client; tag resources and events with matter IDs. - Dashboards for consumption, budget burn rate, and forecast vs. actual.

Chargeback

- Internal price lists for AI features (per draft, per 1K tokens, per request). - Volume tiers and SLAs; rebates for high cache hit rates or off-peak usage.

GPU/accelerator capacity planning

Workload profiles

- Real-time drafting assistance (low latency, steady QPS with spikes). - Batch summarization and discovery review (throughput-focused, latency-tolerant).

Sizing methodology

- Measure tokens/sec and latency targets; calculate QPS per GPU for each model size and precision. - Right-size memory: ensure model + KV cache fits; use tensor/sequence parallel only when justified. - Plan for headroom: 30% buffer for diurnal peaks; separate pools for production vs. experimentation.

Autoscaling

- Scale up by queue depth, p95 latency, and GPU utilization; scale to zero for batch queues. - Warm pools for cold-start mitigation; pre-load weights for popular models.

Preemption strategies

- Use spot/preemptible for non-critical batch; checkpoint frequently and enable instance diversification. - Keep hot spares on on-demand for steady-state inference.

Model optimization levers

Distillation

- Train smaller student models for common tasks (classification, clause extraction) to offload from LLMs.

Quantization

- INT8 or 4-bit quantization for inference where accuracy impact is acceptable; validate on legal evaluation sets.

Prompt and KV caching

- Cache retrieval and system prompts; share KV cache across similar requests; deduplicate frequent clause patterns.

Routing

- Heuristic or learned routers: small model for routine clauses, large model for complex reasoning or low-confidence cases.

Context management

- Reduce input tokens via aggressive retrieval filtering, de-duplication, and strip non-essential metadata.

Cloud vendor negotiation levers

Commitments

- Negotiate committed spend tied to GPU capacity reservations; secure flexible instance families.

Networking and storage

- Waive or discount egress for vector store traffic; tiered pricing for high IOPS storage.

Support and roadmap

- Co-funded optimization work; access to new accelerator SKUs; early access to inference endpoints with SLA credits.

Multi-cloud portability

- Containerize inference stacks; use standard runtimes (Kubernetes + inference serving); keep vector embeddings model-agnostic where feasible.

Sustainability and ESG

Carbon-aware scheduling

- Shift batch jobs to regions/times with cleaner energy; use grid carbon intensity signals.

Emissions reporting

- Attribute emissions by matter/client; integrate with showback dashboards; produce ESG disclosures aligned to frameworks.

Efficiency targets

- Track energy per 1K tokens and per approved draft; set reduction OKRs through model and infrastructure improvements.

Policy automation for spend and compliance

Budget controls

- Automated alerts on budget thresholds; enforce hard-stops or require approvals beyond limits.

Compliance gates

- Prevent workloads from running in non-compliant regions; block models lacking required attestations.

Lifecycle management

- Auto-suspend idle GPU nodes; reclaim unused vector indices; expire caches per data retention policy.

Implementation runbook

Phase 1: Baseline

- Instrument cost and performance per feature; tag all resources with matter/practice identifiers. - Establish unit cost baselines; define SLAs and SLOs.

Phase 2: Optimize

- Implement routing and caching; test quantization; move batch to spot with checkpointing. - Tune retrieval filters and context length to reduce tokens.

Phase 3: Govern

- Deploy policy automation; build showback/chargeback; integrate emissions reporting. - Negotiate capacity commitments; set heat maps for accelerator utilization.

Phase 4: Scale safely

- Separate prod/experiment GPU pools; canary model updates with budget guards. - Quarterly cost reviews with practice leads; publish internal price updates.

Outcomes and KPIs

- 25-45% cost reduction per approved draft via routing, caching, and right-sizing. - 2-3x throughput improvement for batch review with quantization and spot utilization. - Predictable budgets through showback/chargeback; 90%+ tagging coverage and 95% alert adherence. - Documented ESG reporting with year-over-year carbon intensity reduction.

Common pitfalls to avoid

- Ignoring multi-tenancy costs: segregation requirements increase overhead; factor into unit economics. - Over-optimizing for cost: balance cost reduction with quality; maintain SLA adherence. - Poor tagging hygiene: incomplete matter/client attribution breaks chargeback accuracy. - Missing sustainability metrics: ESG reporting becomes mandatory; build measurement early.

Conclusion

Strategic cloud and cost governance for AI requires discipline across unit economics, capacity planning, model optimization, and policy automation. Legal enterprises that master these disciplines will scale AI responsibly while maintaining predictable costs, measurable sustainability progress, and strong compliance posture.